Skip Navigation Links
 Home 
 Registration 
 Pre Registered 
  
 Personal page 
 Archive 
Scroll up
Scroll down
-
-
Scroll up
Scroll down
               
Skip Navigation Links
        صفحه اصلی
        ساختار همایش
        مکان برگزاری
        ثبت نام
        ثبت نام شدگان
         مقالات
        مقالات پذیرفته شده
        برنامه همایش
        تماس با ما
        صفحه شخصی
        جستجوی سخنران
        آرشیو سمينار سالهای گذشته
 
مقاله Abstract


Title: Big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using central versus peripheral air injection: a clinical trial
Author(s): Seyed-Hashem Daryabari, MD, Sepehr Feizi, M.D ,Mohammad Ali Javadi, MD
Presentation Type: Oral
Subject: Cornea and Refractive
Others:
Presenting Author:
Name: Seyed hashem Daryabari
Affiliation :(optional) Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
E mail: shdarya50@yahoo.com
Phone:
Mobile: 09113201959
Purpose:

To compare two sites of air injection to achieve Descemet's membrane (DM) detachment in big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

Methods:

In this prospective, randomized study, 48 eyes of 48 keratoconus-affected patients who underwent DALK by cornea fellows were enrolled. Each patient was randomly assigned into one of two groups. After trephination to approximately 80% of the corneal thickness, a 27-gauge needle was inserted into the stroma from the trephination site. The needle was moved radially inside the trephination site and advanced to the central or paracentral cornea in group 1. In group 2, the needle was inserted into the deep stroma from the trephination site and advanced into the peripheral cornea to approximately 1.5 mm anterior to the limbus. Air was gently injected into the deep stroma until a big bubble was formed. The rates of DM separation and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results:

Big-bubble formation was successful in 79.2% of the eyes in the entire study group. A bare DM was achieved by central injection in 68.0% of group 1 and by peripheral injection in 69.6% of group 2 (P=0.68). This rate was increased to 80.0% and 78.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, after the injection site was shifted when injections failed. The study groups were comparable in terms of complications including DM perforation and bubble bursting.

Conclusion:

Both injection sites were equivalent in their rates of big-bubble formation and complications. Less experienced surgeons are advised to initially inject air outside the trephination.

Attachment:





Last News

  -